Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 181 - 200
of 10,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
The seminal case on that point is Moench v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 1:22 pm
Weems v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
See Senior Executives Association v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:11 am
ICE proposed to one company that it would waive the licensing fee if it directed stock transactions to the NYSE, which has seen its share of the equities business dwindle, instead of rival exchanges, an executive at the trading firm said.link: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-28/nyse-draws-users-ire-with-fee-increases-patent-charge-proposal**Recall Edge Capture LLC et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:09 am
For these violations, and in light of his cooperation, the attorney was ordered to disgorge $182,000, cease and desist from future violations, and be barred from practicing before the Commission or participating in any penny-stock offering (In the Matter of Daniel V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:06 pm
In Cargill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
Paxton appeal because “constitutionally protected expressive activity” is not at issue in the stock buyback rules. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
ArchKey Intermediate Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm
In a rare appellate opinion dealing with a Texas stock law, the Waco Court of Appeals recently found in favor of Bradley Evans, an “alleged” cow owner in the case of Evans v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:03 am
UNITE HERE v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:28 am
” [The Fulton is the US Supreme Court case Fulton Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Delaware: Breach of Duty of Loyalty Due to Entrenchment Through Preferred Stock From John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson: Recently, Vice Chancellor Laster issued this decision in Johnston v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:04 pm
In Feldman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Where stock splits or stock rights are involved, the courts generally hold that if the bequest is specific, there is no ademption since the additional stocks represent a change in form, not substance. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
In early 2016, Mazzal’s CEO entered into a stock purchase agreement (SPA) in which he agreed to sell 45.8 million restricted shares of Mazzal to B2. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
It is thus an apt time to take stock of West Virginia’s impact, particularly as we may see yet another landmark major questions doctrine decision from the Court by the end of the month in Biden v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:40 pm
Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
A presumption of prudence would require plaintiffs to make a showing that would not be required in an ordinary duty of prudence case, such as that the employer was on the brink of collapse (Fifth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer, June 25, 2014, Breyer, S). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:24 am
In Exxon Mobil Co. v. [read post]
