Search for: "Stone v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
(16-cv-02442) that was filed in federal court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
(16-cv-02442) that was filed in federal court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Canada On 31 October 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia handed down judgement in favour of the defendants in the case of Seyedalikhani v Mansouri, 2023 BCSC 1902. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
Columbia University 7. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that the territory is time-barred from seeking contribution from the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2008, 7:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California held in Columbia Pictures v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Tile & Stone, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 1366, 1372 (TTAB 2009). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
California, 554 U.S. 353, 358–61 (2008) (admissibility of hearsay); District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
One case was Masses Publishing Co v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
Wash., No. 2:17-cv-01297; and Stone v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am
” “Walgreens separately sued Crowell in 2021 in District of Columbia Superior Court seeking, among other things, indemnification from any arbitral award, an injunction against Crowell and disgorgement of the firm’s profits from its work for Humana. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh looks back at a footnote in the Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
V&E Raises Associate Salaries in Texas and D.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(The IP Factor) ‘Laboratoire Remede’ and ‘Remede Spa’ considered generic (The IP Factor) Supreme Court rules that usage of ‘Shemesh’ (Sun) by competing restaurant is kosher (The IP Factor) Israel patent office publishes decision on design for kerb-stone (IP Factor) Italy Italy scores three more PDOs - Marrone di Caprese Michelangelo, Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio, Crudo di Cuneo (Class 46) Lavazza to Nespresso – we were in Heaven first… [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The witness is actor Yael Stone. [read post]
