Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2016, 10:04 am
See Granite Music Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:42 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:44 pm
Petersburg Times has a story about the recent decision in Remia v City of St. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:57 am
Levinsky v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:36 pm
I just finished reading Snyder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
The case was U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:26 pm
Here is the abstract:Though diversity remains a compelling state interest, recent rulings like Ricci v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Here's the abstract:Embedded deep in the constitutional imagination is the notion that courts can implement rights and effectuate the hope of Marbury v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:16 pm
And Elaine Godfrey of The Atlantic has an article headlined “The GOP’s Strange Turn Against Rape Exceptions; If Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:31 am
The justices issued a highly unusual order Tuesday for the parties in Zubik v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:46 am
Strange invalidating Alabama's bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:58 pm
Listen: The case is Glossip v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 5:36 am
In Bid Industrial Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Strang and another [2007] SCA 144 (RSA) the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa has ruled on 23 November 2007 that arresting a person in order to found or confirm (civil) jurisdiction is unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:36 am
The case is MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
It was rather a strange morning at the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
Strange [text] that the state same-sex marriage ban was unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:10 am
US v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:05 am
In Strawser v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
Strange things are afoot with respect to the Internet presence of the Consumer Product Safety Commission ("CPSC"). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:39 pm
The reverse discrimination case Ricci v. [read post]