Search for: "Strength v. U.s.*" Results 1 - 20 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Untold Strength of Tax Crimes in Manhattan DA’s Case Against Former President Trump
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
TTAB Takes Up Question Whether Incontestable Status Lends To Mark's Strength In Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
10 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
 In Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
Strength of Positions on Issues Unrelated to Dispositive Ruling Should Not Be Considered in Determining Attorney Fees Award
27 Dec 2017, 6:57 am by Docket Navigator
" Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Strength in Numbers? The Lobbying Push for a PTE
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm by FDABlog HPM
Hilton’s August 3, 2010 decision in The Medicines Company v. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
Looking Ahead to Kimbrough v. US
6 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
US v. [read post]
DailyWrit - http://dailywrit.com
Strength in Numbers: The Seventh Circuit Joins the Third and Eleventh Circuits in Limiting the Definition of an Automatic Telephone Dialing System under the TCPA
25 Feb 2020, 2:41 pm by Corinne Falotico
In Gadelhak v. [read post]
TCPA Watch - https://www.tmtlawwatch.com/
The CAFC second guesses CD Cal on relative strength of invalidity theories; remand asks for a more complete explanation
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In Polara Engineering v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Doe v. Mattis and the Right of Citizens to Return to the United States
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
The strength of this protection is contingent on where the traveler happens to be going. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part II)
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
NLRB v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Teva v. Astrazeneca: Invalidating a patent with secret prior art
1 Dec 2011, 7:40 pm by Rantanen
  Quoting from Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Microsoft v. i4i: Supreme Court Affirms Strong Presumption of Patent Validity
9 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Supreme Court 2011) The patent act indicates that issued patents are "presumed valid. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Plum House IV, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Merchant Services, LLC (Maryland U.S.D.C.)
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Maryland law controlled the negligence claim and NY law controlled the breach of contract claim.Analysis: The Court relied on Jacques v. [read post]
Maryland Business Law Developments - http://marylandbusinesslawdevelopments.blogspot.com/
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Bartlett v. Strickland
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Unwired Planet v. Apple: Fault and Patent Infringement
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm by Jason Rantanen
Unwired Planet v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Further Comments of Professor McCarthy Regarding TTAB Dilution Analysis
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
" Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Trump v. National Security Facts
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am by Andrew Mark Bennett
Holder v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
In an appeal from a district court’s decision declining to “reopen [a] detention hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f),” the Second Circuit concludes that the district court declining to reopen the detention hearing wasn’t an abuse of discretion. And the district court’s consideration of the strength of the evidence against the defendant, in weighing the bail factors listed in § 3142(g), didn’t impinge on the presumption of innocence because that’s a trial right that “has no application to a determination of the rights of a pretrial detainee.” United States v. Zhang, No. 22-1761-cr, __ F.4th ____, 2022 WL 17419594 (2d Cir. Dec. 6, 2022) (C.J.J.’s Raggi, Wesley, and Nardini).
8 Dec 2022, 9:39 am by Darrell Fields
” United States v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
More on Bryant v. Medtronic
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Bexis
  That none of them did is a sign of the strength of the preemption doctrine in the medical device field.First, the plaintiffs tried an argument that had prevailed in Wyeth v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
On Tafas v. Dudas: selected excerpts
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from putting its new claims and continuation rules into effect (SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff’s Desire for “Payback” and Litigation Abuse Warrant Fee Award Under § 285
12 Mar 2015, 7:06 am by Docket Navigator
" Universal Electronics Inc. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/