Search for: "Strong v. Anderson" Results 101 - 120 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
Anderson, a Q&A moderated by Brookings Senior Fellow Frank Rose, and a panel discussion led by Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Foreign Policy Program. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Jurecic shared the mysterious ruling; Jurecic and Scott Anderson then unpacked it. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Selikoff entered Anderson’s College of Medicine, in Glasgow, Scotland.10 April 26, 1937. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:43 am by Erik J. Heels
SPARKY ANDERSON: Are you guys crazy? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" That was the headline from columnists Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta in Washington Post on January 15, 1986. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Derek Muller
To support her theory, Kagan cited Anderson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Some judges already do this, but usually only in cases where it is clear in advance that there will be strong public interest and media coverage. [read post]