Search for: "Strong v. Cochran et al"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Despite the strong clinical heterogeneity, the Cochrane authors performed their meta-analysis with a fixed-effect model. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
E.g., SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
The MDL court noted that both sides had cited Borenstein’s textbook on meta-analysis,[27] and that Wells had himself cited the Cochrane Handbook[28] for the basic proposition that that objective and scientifically valid study selection criteria should be clearly stated in advance to ensure the objectivity of the analysis. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
