Search for: "Strong v. Cook*" Results 1 - 20 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by INFORRM
  The decision of the Court of Appeal in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group on 22 June 2011 was another strong indication of the attitude of the Courts to this ancient constitutional right. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:00 am by Florian Mueller
One is that Microsoft itself faced a tying claim in one of the most famous U.S. antitrust cases, which is precedent that both parties are citing now in Epic v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am by Florian Mueller
The first thing that happened was that the court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson, who has a strong antitrust background but (a) is based in San Francisco and (b) handled discovery-related matters for Judge YGR in Epic Games v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
It is and should remain a strong thing to impose a prior restraint on publication. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
”While Patricia Kane, the EEOC’s acting Los Angeles district director, added, “This settlement sends a strong message that the EEOC will vigorously enforce federal laws against sexual harassment and retaliation. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
 Both sides made strong, persuasive arguments for their desired outcomes. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by Chris Attig
The Federal Circuit used strong language in affirming the decision of the Veterans Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
It can, I think, fairly be said that the strong impression given to the Claimants at the 21 November meeting was that it was the intention of the, then, Government to proceed with Part 2. [read post]