Search for: "Strong v. Cox"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am
(It was interesting to see the court here cite to Luvdarts v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
The evidence of knowledge in Cox’s case was particularly strong, the court said, because Cox received not one or two but at least fourteen notices of infringement for multiple individual users over a six-month period. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
" (Cox, 30-31) (quoting Advanta USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
Last week’s BMG v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:37 pm
Cox, 06-5134 (D.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:31 am
Henheffer, and Donald V. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:24 pm
See, Cox v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Ceballos and Pickering v Board of Education, Turley suggested that Cox would have a strong case for arguing that his firing was a violation of First Amendment rights. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
Cox in Connection With Comcast Cable Communication et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Cox’s comments and these cases serve as strong indicators that DOJ is starting to exercise the discretion granted to government investigators in the Granston Memo to dismiss unmeritorious matters. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
This is the Kate Cox case. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
In hindsight, as the Brief suggests, the Cox Commission proposal doesn't look so bad. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Cox Communications, Inc., 2020 WL 3121306 (E.D. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
On 29 January 2011 Cox J granted an injunction to restrain publication. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:59 am
TweetFollowing up on Obsidian Finance Group v. [read post]
