Search for: "Structural Steel Works, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
ILL., No. 08 C 5214, June 12, 2009 Plaintiff Standard Iron Works ("Standard") commenced a class action against domestic steel producers, as a direct purchaser of steel products. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:45 am by John Hochfelder
Structure-Tone, Inc. (1st Dept. 2012), the all of the damages awards were affirmed. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:33 pm by rohdec12
Our total installed development and construction costs for Steel Winds I were approximately $35 million, excluding prepaid turbine maintenance and warranty costs, and are financed by a combination of equity and structurally subordinated debt of CSSW, LLC. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Chowdhury's proposed final judgment would impose a sizable judgment against the whole Prenda team: It is hereby ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Chowdhury recover jointly and severally from Plaintiff AF Holdings, Inc., Prenda Law, Inc., John L. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:37 am by Michael B. Stack
  During the demolition works an asbestos insulation board (AIB) covering a steel column was damaged, and a Wall Colmonoy employee was informed that they should tape a plastic bags around it. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:14 am by David M. McLain
Inc. case, the Colorado Supreme Court held that the Economic Loss Rule barred the steel subcontractor’s negligence claims against the engineering firm and inspector for a public works project, even though the subcontractor had not directly contracted with the engineering firm or inspector. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:48 am
In February 2009, plaintiff entered two subcontractor agreements with Big Poll whereby plaintiff agreed to perform the structural steel work, masonry, and concrete slabs on the Project. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:49 am by Sean Wajert
Steel Group, 902 F.2d 573, 574 (7th Cir. 1990), generally includes damages resulting from inadequate value because the product is inferior and does not work for the general purposes for which it was manufactured and sold. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:14 am by Michael S. Levine
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey recently ruled in Cypress Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]