Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 14,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2015, 5:18 am
Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
On January 21, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harris v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
On January 21, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 10:00 am
Sue Ann Mota (Bowling State University, Department of Legal Studies) has published DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
For example, in Lingepo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
Here is the abstract: In Lautsi v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Cir. 2007) Eyewitness Testimony State of New Jersey v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:47 pm
full size map By Juliette Terzieff, WeNews correspondent: The Center for Reproductive Rights studied what would happen if Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:17 am
Times, a recent California study shows improvement of public schools in the state since settlement of the lawsuit Williams v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
The post State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
The study is Benefit Cost Comparisons Between State and Local Governments and Private-Sector Employers; here's the abstract: This paper examines some... [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm
Patricia Melom v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
He was however able to identify a narrower implied statutory authority for the sponsor licensing scheme incidental to the Secretary of State’s explicitly identified function of regulating entry to study under s 1(4) of the 1971 Act: [33] and [37]. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:53 pm
In a recent securities class action (Curry v. [read post]
