Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
  Richard Doll & Julian Peto, Asbestos: Effects on health of exposure to asbestos 8 (1985) (“In particular, there are no grounds for believing that gastrointestinal cancers in general are peculiarly likely to be caused by asbestos exposure. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:42 pm by Barry Barnett
So a 9-0 Supreme Court held today in Bowman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Most noticeable there is the ongoing Costco v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“The government has not articulated an interest in generally regulating the distribution of T-shirts, baseball caps, bobblehead dolls, or any other merchandise that may be available as part of a continuity program, or of regulating continuity programs themselves. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm by Russell Beck
(sometimes called the “Bratz case” because the dispute concerns the Bratz dolls). [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:14 pm by Gordon Firemark
An 8-person jury unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that Mattel did not own the rights to the Bratz dolls, early models or sketches; and said that MGA did not steal trade secrets.ew trial. 9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law Larry Montz, et al v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm by Bradley Gross
    -  Bryant left Mattel to become a consultant for MGA, and MGA turned the Bratz dolls into a billion dollar success. [read post]