Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll" Results 61 - 80 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Class 46)   India Geographical indication protection for Tanjavur dolls (Spicy IP) Economic implications of copyright: the exhaustion principle (International Law Office) Extensions of copyrights? [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Does Petra Moser show patents encourage successful innovation? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“The government has not articulated an interest in generally regulating the distribution of T-shirts, baseball caps, bobblehead dolls, or any other merchandise that may be available as part of a continuity program, or of regulating continuity programs themselves. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The Pussycat Dolls are bringing a lawsuit against the Daily Mail’s parent company following the Mail Online publishing an article describing the band as a “prostitution ring” by former member Kaya Jones. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
  Richard Doll & Julian Peto, Asbestos: Effects on health of exposure to asbestos 8 (1985) (“In particular, there are no grounds for believing that gastrointestinal cancers in general are peculiarly likely to be caused by asbestos exposure. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Second big theme is harm and its relationship to the scope of TM rights: Likely success on the merits, or success on the merits, now justifies a presumption of irreparable harm for preliminary or permanent injunctive relief, restoring the rule that many circuits used before eBay v Mercexchange, though the knowledge of this change is percolating through the lower courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]