Search for: "Supreme Court of the State of Delaware"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “Delaware Supreme Court Holds MFW Inapplicable Based on Banker Conflict Disclosure Deficiencies” — “The Delaware Supreme Court has reversed a Court of Chancery decision dismissing challenges to the acquisition of Inovalon Holdings, Inc. by a consortium led by Swedish private equity firm Nordic Capital in a decision demonstrating the importance of disclosure of financial advisor conflicts in order to obtain… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court should affirm that dismissal. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:52 am
In the states, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the presence of one conflicted committee member precluded MFW cleansing of a controller-led spinoff.Read the rest of the story and other securities news from Wolters Kluwer at VitalLaw.com. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:28 am
The Chief Justice of Delaware’s Supreme Court has noted that business entities indirectly or directly generate about a third of the state’s revenue.[4] (more…) [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:28 am
The Chief Justice of Delaware’s Supreme Court has noted that business entities indirectly or directly generate about a third of the state’s revenue.[4] (more…) [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:01 am
It also aligns the federal-court standard within the circuit with the standard adopted by the supreme courts of two of its constituent states (Delaware and New Jersey). [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
One point of difficulty here is the Supreme Court’s precedent in Walden v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:31 am
The company took on the challenges onf taming the disparate and unruly world of state court litigation. with the inaugural state court launch of Delaware Chancery in 2018. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, have shown deference to doctors over law enforcement in other recent cases to do with prescribing medicine, including powerful opioids. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
The “siblings” are five or so related lawsuits filed in New York State Supreme Court beginning in 2017 — the federal court lawsuit was filed some five years later — involving essentially the same parties, none of which according to the court dockets have been resolved as yet. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:15 am
[…] There is a direct right of appeal from the trial courts to the Delaware Supreme Court and, in certain circumstances, appeals can be heard on an expedited basis in a matter of weeks or even days. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Belton, heard in the Supreme Court of Delaware. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
[Defendant standing must exist at all stages of any litigation and must be raised by the justices of the Supreme Court even if the litigants themselves fail to raise it] On Thursday, April 25th the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution vests in Congress the authority to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
A Delaware court was less forgiving to a COVID-19 claim [ Hudson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
