Search for: "Sweeney v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289915.dis.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Again, I wasn't initially sold, but I watched the further developments with an open mind and less than a year later I think--in light of the recent announcement by three United States Senators--that the CAF may go down in history as one of the most impactful and important policy efforts in the history of the tech industry.The tide has turned. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Hunter’s testimony also touched on the Board’s decision in Specialty Healthcare, which makes it easier for unions to certify “micro” bargaining units. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
On the same day there will be the hearing of an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Quester v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:13 am
Sweeney, James D. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:37 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:38 pm
Hager v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The claim about "more mature content for more serious gaming" is something that with my games industry background (once the first person to work for Blizzard outside the United States) and my own experience playing games I have to reject: it's just not true that mature content implies or fosters serious gaming. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
In the United States, silicosis litigation has been infused with fraud and deception, not by the defendants, but by the litigation industry that creates lawsuits. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:57 am
In Jacobson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
In his initial post on Wednesday, this Kat speculated about the apparent monopoly of the economics of IP by (admittedly excellent and informative) economists from the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
He would have been there while still an employee of the taxpayers of the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm
Whelan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
Sweeney, J.D., Retired MVS Attorney and the first woman patent lawyer in the state of Iowa. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
