Search for: "Sweet v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm by Richard Flores
In a follow up to last year’s blog entry regarding the case Association of Molecular Pathology, et al. v United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al we continue to look into this potentially revolutionary biotechnology case. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:03 pm by Stuart Kaplow
There are more than 5.6 million existing commercial buildings in the United States today. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:03 pm by Stuart Kaplow
There are more than 5.6 million existing commercial buildings in the United States today. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:40 pm by JD Hull
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:44 pm
United States describes five factors which "taken together" support the Court's conclusion. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am by Ben Rubin
  United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
United and combined, i-Law and v-Lex, with the former’s Lloyd’s Law Reports, Building Law Reports, Chinese Maritime and Commercial Law Reports, Medical Law Reports and more, as well as various news reports, might put them in the IV league (and trussed up with the chaotic British Tories). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Robert Cook-Deegan
  It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]