Search for: "Swinehart, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 4:09 am
He also sued Hartman and Swinehart in state court. [read post]
12 May 2013, 3:35 pm
P. 94; Swinehart v, Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc., 48 S.W.3d 865, 875 (Tex. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
Attorney for Hartman and Swinehart: Karen R. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:14 pm
Gabe Keri, a 25-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam writes:Suzanne Swinehart and Virginia Hartman bring this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:37 am
Id., (quoting In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210, 213 (CCPA 1971) and further citing In re Hallman, 655 F.2d 212, 215 (CCPA 1981); In re Ludtke, 441 F.2d 660, 663-64 (CCPA 1971).) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Cir. 2011) (“[T]he Board reasonably interpreted Rule 41.37 to require more substantive arguments in an appeal brief than a mere recitation of the claim elements and a naked assertion that the corresponding elements were not found in the prior art. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 5:14 am
(Quoting In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210 (C.C.P.A. 1971)). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am
Swinehart considered the following claim to an infrared-transparent crystal (useful, among other things, for the front window of heat-seeking missiles): 24. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:43 pm
The First Liberty Insurance Corp., 984 A.2d 938 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 995 A.2d 354 (Pa. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
Bunzl appealed to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”). [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Id. at 886–88.Mylan has appealed the district court’s judgment ofinfringement and no invalidity of the ’727 patent, andMedicines has cross-appealed the district court’s summaryjudgment of noninfringement of the ’343 patent. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
" In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210, 213, 58 C.C.P.A. 1027 (C.C.P.A. 1971). [read post]
