Search for: "Swint v. Doe"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
” Swint v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 7:03 am
Swint v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
A non-final decision does not become final simply because it is issued in the same order as a final decision. (...)The Supreme Court, in Swint v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Swint, 456 U. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
Swint, No. 11-66-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
See People v Swint, 225 Mich App 353, 362; 572 NW2d 666 (1997) (upholding MCL 750.224f’s ban on gun possession by felons be¬cause it “[a]rguably” “does not completely foreclose defendant’s consti¬tution¬al right to bear ‘arms,’ i.e., nonfirearm weapons, in defense of himself”). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Ruttenberg v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
See Swint v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 8:01 pm
” Quoting Swint v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
See Swint v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
