Search for: "Sword v. Sword" Results 201 - 220 of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2021, 9:20 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In planning where marital deduction gifts or charitable gifts are likely and closely held business interests are involved, efforts should always be undertaken to anticipate these issues in the planning stage to avoid the division of a majority interest in a business into minority interests that are used to fund these deductible transfers.Estate of Warne v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am by Howard Friedman
Rickless, Maimon Schwarzschild, William Voegeli, Larry Alexander, 54 San Diego Law Review 197-341 (2017).Gerard V. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Bancorp, 513 U.S. at 22(“[V]acatur ‘clears the path for future relitigation of the issues between the parties and eliminates a judgment. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Jacobs of the Delaware Court of Chancery (currently serving as a Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court), is Fulk v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:02 am by Howard Wasserman
Second, the panel divided over the proper understanding of the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 2:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) McAdie v Royal Bank of Scotland [2007] EWCA Civ 806 (31 July 2007) IFE Fund SA v Goldman Sachs International [2007] EWCA Civ 811 (31 July 2007) Massey v Unifi [2007] EWCA Civ 800 (31 July 2007) Deadman v Bristol City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 822 (31 July 2007) EB (Ethiopia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 809 (31 July 2007) AG (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:55 am
June 23, 2009).* Defendant's possession of a samuri sword and other knives justified his patdown. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
If Section 1 is a guide, then Section 3 cannot be used as a sword to disqualify Trump, absent federal enforcement legislation. [read post]