Search for: "Sykes v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm by John Elwood
Smith, the latter over the dissent of Justice Alito (joined by the Chief and Justices Scalia). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
First Derivative Traders, 09-525, Sykes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
SOURCE: AUSTIN COURT OF APPEAL - No. 03-11-00091-CV – 2/1/2013 – Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:15 pm by Washington Law Review
Smith   African Poverty Duncan Kennedy   Comments: Discernible Differences: A Survey of Civil Jury Demands M Michelle Dunning   High-Tech Harassment: Employer Liability Under Title VII for Employee Social Media Misconduct Jeremy Gelms   Driving Dangerously: Vehicle Flight and the Armed Career Criminal Act after Sykes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:19 am by Jeralyn
US, concerning crack sentence reduction authority (lower court opinion) Sykes v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Brown (10-76) — same issue as in 09-1343 (separate argument) Wed., Jan. 12: Sykes v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Distinctiveness in that instance was to be assessed through immediacy or first impression test (Case T-130/01 Sykes Enterprises Incorp. v OHIM), that is when “…it is perceived immediately as an indication of the commercial origin of the goods or services in question, so as to enable the relevant public to distinguish, without any possibility of confusion, the goods or services of the owner of the mark from those of a different commercial origin. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  The newly granted case is Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
  The following cases were granted for argument in the 2010 Term: Title: Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Last week, the court heard Roberts-Smith ordered the mock execution of an unarmed civilian during an SAS training drill in 2012. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Smith v. [read post]