Search for: "Sykes v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
United States and James v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:39 pm
For a taste of the arguments that are likely to come, here is Justice Scalia’s 2011 dissent in Sykes v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:36 am
Wise words from Judge Diane Sykes, writing for a Seventh Circuit en banc majority in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
United States) and “attempted burglary” (James v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 10:30 am
So held the unsurprising decision in Denison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
United States, which involved the question of whether fleeing from the police in a car was a violent felony, and Graham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
, a question raised in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
” Citizens United v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
