Search for: "T Jamison" Results 21 - 40 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 9:20 pm
But alas, the words aren't flowing today. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am by Orin S. Kerr
Let me be the first to add:  Yes, I realize that, if it turns out I'm right, it doesn't  undermine the case against qualified immunity. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by SHG
And perhaps Jamison now understands how a client must feel. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:58 am
We can figure out for ourselves what works and what doesn’t. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:23 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
  Well, as we know from Jamison's post, sometimes they do. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Jamison Koehler followed up with a post on perspectives on losing at trial. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:43 am by SHG
  But there was also a subtext to Jamison's post that likely wouldn't occur to anyone who became so inured to working in the justice factory. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:51 am by SHG
Jamison, since her theme is joggers because she’s a jogger and joggers are special, can’t resist the lure of the Central Park Jogger case. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 1:42 pm
Avedon Carol on Eric Boehlert's and Jamison Foser's Media Matters column. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm
The actual arresting didn't start until after 1 a.m. and it took until 3:30 a.m. for the riot-equipped cops to leave the scene. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 7:50 am
Jamison Foser details how the Media, especially its political reporters, are simply incompetent. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:35 pm by Howard Friedman
Jamison, (FL App., Sept. 16, 2011), a Florida state appellate court held that deciding a dispute about governance of the First Baptist Church of Micanopy would unconstitutionally entangle the court in a religious controversy. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:02 pm by Dasha Galperin
You won’t want to miss this explosive story – listen here. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:13 am by Ken Lammers
After reading Jamison Koehler's post on innocent possession of a firearm, I see that he is talking about a D.C. exception to any possession of a firearm charge so that if (1) there is a lack of criminal purpose, and (2) the gun is possessed as an affirmative effort to further "social policy underlying enforcement" it is not illegalMy answer now shifts to, I don't think this defense exists, but you would have to look at what ever possession statute the defendant… [read post]