Search for: "TAXPAYERS OF MICHIGAN V STATE OF MICHIGAN "
Results 61 - 80
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Winn, 09-987, and Garriott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Winn, 09-987, and Garriott v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
For example, Georgia’s taxpayers reach the state’s sixth and highest bracket at $7,000 in taxable income. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
For example, Georgia’s taxpayers reach the state’s sixth and highest bracket at $7,000 in taxable income. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
Stowers Chair in Law & Religion Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 3:06 pm
In Mel Goldstein, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Holland of the Associated Press (via the Wall Street Journal) report on the Court’s denial of a petition filed by Michigan and other states asking the Court to order the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Present day taxpayers and sewer services users should not be severely penalized for longstanding neglect on the part of the defendant. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
