Search for: "TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
The priority documents include, among other documents, (1) a memo and note drafted by James Uthmeier, a senior counsel in the Department of Commerce, and hand delivered to John Gore, the acting head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, and (2) the drafts of the Justice Department’s 2017 letter to the Department of Commerce formally requesting the inclusion of the citizenship question on the census as a mechanism… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Section 3 provides:“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Con-gress, or elector of President and Vice President, orhold any office, civil or military, under the UnitedStates, or under any State, who, having previouslytaken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officerof the United States, or as a member of any State leg-islature, or as an executive or judicial officer of anyState, to support the Constitution of the… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
And Elliot Setzer shared a U.S. district judge’s decision compelling President Trump to turn over his financial records to the Manhattan district attorney’s office. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
Taylor also summarized U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
The United States Attorney appeared specially and by motion challenged the jurisdiction of the Surrogate's Court over the appellant. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
The United States Attorney appeared specially and by motion challenged the jurisdiction of the Surrogate's Court over the appellant. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Jeremy Gordon discussed the Justice Department’s findings in its recent review of the FISA application errors identified by the department’s inspector general’s office. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
The purpose of this enumeration was to counteract the dangerous provision of the Sweeping Clause that had caused Randolph and George Mason so much anxiety in Philadelphia and had prevented them and Elbridge Gerry from signing the Constitution in the first place: namely, its reference to “other powers” vested in the Government of the United States, over and above the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Taylor and Harbison is not a per se challenge to execution by lethal injection and it does not require the court to micromanage the Department of Corrections. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]