Search for: "TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT GROUP, INC. v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's… [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> USA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Here is how the APHA describes itself and its activities to advance public health: “The American Public Health Association champions the health of all people and all communities. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:48 pm
Headquartered in Columbus, Indiana, (USA), Cummins Inc. designs, manufactures, distributes and services engines and related technologies, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission solutions and electrical power generation systems. “As a design and manufacturing company, it is critical to have high-performance solutions that can scale as our business grows,” said Curt Brown, Storage Technology Director, Cummins Inc.… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Philip Morris USA, et al. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Andrew Grossman and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Spotlight) Are patent exceptions necessary for climate change technology? [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
There was also a Norwich Pharmacal application in the case of Braben v Google Inc before HHJ Parkes QC. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
” Electric Power Group v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
See, EEOC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
(Haverhill, MA) Acd Usa, Ltd. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
With advances in computer technology making genetic testing exponentially cheaper and more detailed as times passes (see Moore’s law), more and more genetic variability in the efficacy of prescription drugs is bound to be discovered. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Regal Ware, Inc et al (Docket Report) ITC decides not to review initial determination on invalidity in certain printing and imaging devices involving Ricoh and Oki Data (ITC Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear Technology and Advanced Analogic Technologies (ITC Law Blog) Defending yourself in inequitable conduct proceedings – CAFC en banc hearing pending: Therasense,… [read post]
