Search for: "THOMAS F. EWING" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am by John Elwood
They argue that “[f]ew questions are more important to our constitutional system than who is entitled to United States citizenship. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
" In addition, "[n]ew parties that have no history upon which to draw may be able to offer evidence of reprisals and threats directed against individuals or organizations holding similar views. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 8:04 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
After noting that “[f]ew facts are needed to appreciate the legal question we face,” the Supreme Court explained that, “[e]ach of the three cases before us started the same way: An employer fired a long-time employee shortly after the employee revealed that he or she is homosexual or transgender — and allegedly for no reason other than the employee’s homosexuality or transgender status. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
”8 So in 2018, the Allen case was merely a “hypothesis generating” case report, but in 2008, when Ratner, Abou-Donia, Oliver, Ewing, and Clapp gave solemn oaths and testified under penalty of perjury to a federal district judge that the facts of the case warranted a claim to scientific knowledge, under Rule 702. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Here's an updated list of the most downloaded IP papers that were posted on SSRN in the past 60 days:The AIA 500 Expanded: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, by Sara Jeruss, Robin Feldman & Thomas Ewing (this study of 13,000 patent cases over 4 years has gotten lots of press; see press release, Thomson Reuters, Law.com, IPWatchdog)The Securitization of Patents, by Michael Risch (see guest post by author on PatentlyO)Patent Trolls by the Numbers, by Colleen V. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by Andrew Weber
Photo Credit: Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Ewing, 444 Pa. 263, 282 A.2d 206 (1971), was rejected. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Nelson included a fascinating exchange between Justice Scalia (joined by Justice Thomas) and Justice Alito (writing for the rest of the Court except for Justice Kagan, who was recused). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
But John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy observes that only “[f]ive of the current members of the Court had unanimous debut opinions. [read post]