Search for: "THOMAS v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA" Results 1 - 20 of 419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
As Georgetown University law professor Paul Butler noted, “She seemed determined not to repeat the performance of the then-presidents of Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, who, testifying before the same committee in December, resolutely avowed their schools’ commitment to free expression. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
In the front row, Judge Thomas Hardiman of the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As Thomas Piketty has shown, returns to capital and to labor have been heavily skewed toward capital in recent decades due largely to legal and economic frameworks.[23] With respect to politics, one often hears that business should remain “neutral. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:40 am by Alice Colarossi and Oliver Beiersdorf
 As Justice Thomas noted in a concurring opinion, “Wilburn Boat has been met with universal criticism over the past 70 years. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm by Kathryn Briuglio
In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas highlighted the “universal criticism” received by Wilburn by pointing out its flawed rationale and reiterating its deficient failure to consider the uniformity principle central to federal maritime law. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Thomas University In the face of new technologies, a nonprofit auto safety body provides an institutional model for elevating public protection ambitions. [read post]