Search for: "TITLE 4-D"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2010, 3:32 am
LEXIS 78510 (D. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:39 am
SEC. 4. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:15 am
Chapter 4, “The Causes of Torture: Law, Medicine and the Assessment of Suffering in British Asylum Claims”Tom K. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:53 am
Firm shareholder Nicholas D. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
For example, insofar as "employees of the State" are concerned, the State Civil Service Commission's Rules, [4 NYCRR 4.1(d) provide that: A promotion eligible list shall not be certified for filling a permanent vacancy created by upward reclassification of a permanently encumbered position where promotion from such list would require the layoff of a permanent employee or the reassignment of a permanent employee to a different geographical location; but this… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
For example, insofar as "employees of the State" are concerned, the State Civil Service Commission's Rules, [4 NYCRR 4.1(d) provide that: A promotion eligible list shall not be certified for filling a permanent vacancy created by upward reclassification of a permanently encumbered position where promotion from such list would require the layoff of a permanent employee or the reassignment of a permanent employee to a different geographical location; but this… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
§ 27.031(b)(4); TEX.R.CIV.P. 501.1[2]; Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
This article represents our best understanding and interpretation based on where things currently stand. [1] You can find our more detailed summary of Title IV here. [2] CESA Section 4029. [3] Carriers and national security businesses will face a higher burden because they also have to show actual or expected losses that “jeopardize” their business under Section 4002(c)(2)(I). [4] CESA 4003(b)(4). [5] CESA Section 4003(c)(3)(D). [6] CESA Section… [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
It was accompanied by an Order removing BIAS from most Title II regulations and a Report and Order applying a set of Open Internet rules to BIAS providers. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:20 am
Platt and referred to Magistrate Judge William D. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
Angelo D. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
SEC. 4. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:24 am
” Id., 4 (Emphasis added). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
Under the title, “No Ap- peal,” Section 314(d) declares that “[t]he determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Pervasive Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment, by Russell D. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said March 4 that he may need to file for cloture to cut off debate on the $31 billion tax extenders bill (H.R. 4213), but he intends to finish the bill March 9. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
Adding to the pressure on the Commission, six United States Senators, Carl Levin (D-MI), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Angus King (I-ME), wrote a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White voicing their support specifically for quick adoption of the proposed rule requiring Form D to be filed prior to any public solicitation. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:45 pm
—Dallas 2008, pet. dism’d w.o.j.). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 10:53 am
And you’d be wrong. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:17 am
—Transmissions of sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, shall be considered authorized and with the consent of the rights owner for purposes of subsection (a), if—(1) the transmissions are made by a transmitting entity publicly performing sound recordings protected under this title by means of digital audio transmissions subject to section 114;(2) the transmissions would satisfy the requirements for statutory licensing under section 114(d)(2) or would be… [read post]
