Search for: "TOMLINSON v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Barbarevech v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Both Maurice Kay LJ, Justice Tomlinson LJ agreed with Hooper LJ and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
The only “media case” amongh the five was Novaya Gazeta V Voronezhe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm
In this context, a recent decision from the United States is of considerable interest. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am
The associate and counsel of record, Ashley Tomlinson, one of the associates in Salazar, filed a declaration stating: "I am very familiar with the hourly rate that attorneys at my level of practice charge in matters of this nature. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
As stated by the Tennessee Supreme Courtin Press v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
In White v Sweden ((2008) 46 EHRR 3) the Article 8 “right to protection of reputation” was combined with the positive obligations of the state in the application. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am
In this context, a recent decision from the United States is of considerable interest. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:33 am
NNU was a state enterprise which distributed gas in the Ukraine, supplied by a Russian company (R). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
