Search for: "Taft v. Administrative Office of the Courts" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court insofar as it upheld the hearing officer's determination regarding the extent of the School District's violation of the DEA, but REVERSE the court's affirmation of the compensatory-education award and REMAND the case with instructions to have the appropriate administrative body craft a remedy that complies with the IDEA. 07a0088p.06 2007/03/02 USA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
With the next administration, he said the controversy escalated. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
As former President William Howard Taft explained in 1915: The Executive office of the President is not a recording office. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Bush Administration may never be tested in federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
In 2006 in Hamden v Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in their plans to hold military commission trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
  Six of the nine members of the New Deal Court joined the opinion in Korematsu v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm by John Elwood
Radford (invalidating provisions of the Frazier-Lemke Farm Mortgage Act), and Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Charlie Plumb, McAfee & Taft
Charlie Plumb is an attorney in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, office of McAfee & Taft. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by Ashley Deeks
  The Trump administration has not yet announced what steps it plans to take in response. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
He has demonstrated a radicalism that seems inappropriate to the office. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:03 am by Samuel Bray
" Bray does not explain why a representation as to non-enforcement of a federal law made by the Taft Administration's Postmaster General (Hitchcock) could rightly estop the Wilson Administration's Postmaster General (Burleson) from enforcing that federal law. [read post]