Search for: "Target Employee 1" Results 21 - 40 of 6,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Except some of the facts in his post look a little different from the Target brief and the judge's opinion.1. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm by Justine Phillips and Laura Jehl
Human Resources and payroll professionals are being targeted by sophisticated cyber criminals to steal employee data. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
While it is true that the hackers involved in the Target breach were targeting credit car [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:23 am by Ann Caresani
The IRS has threatened employers with PPACA penalties of $36,500 per employee, per year, nondeductible. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
The H-1B visa program is aggressively targeted in this new piece of legislation. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:59 am by Buckingham
The employee retention credit (ERC) can be a tremendous boon for eligible employers to claim substantial cash refunds for keeping their employees on the payroll during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 12:13 pm by Vaish Palavalli
  Generally, there are three primary types of forensic image collection techniques: 1) creating a physical forensic image of the device; 2) collecting a logical image; or 3) doing a targeted collection of device data. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:51 pm by Jeffrey S. Horton Thomas
As for the purpose of requiring the reports, Senate Bill 973 pulls no punches: state government agencies will use the reports against employers for “targeted enforcement” of California pay equity, anti-discrimination and wage and hour laws. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Effective January 1, 2017, section 925 provides as follows: (a) An employer shall not require an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would do either of the following: (1) Require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California. [read post]
In an Advice Memorandum released Thursday, the NLRB’s Division of Advice concluded that employees who discussed an employer’s tip-pooling practices engaged in protected concerted activity, such that discharging the employees for this activity violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 11:57 am by Satya Marar
The central argument is that preventing an employee from working for a competitor for a period of time after they cease to work for their current employer “interfere[s] with, restrain[s], or coerce[s]” [Section 8(a)(1), NLRA] him or her from exercising their right to “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection” [Section 7, NLRA], as restricting alternative employment opportunities would… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Jeffrey H. Ruzal and Carly Baratt
The sexual harassment policy must contain the following elements: (1) a prohibition on sexual harassment; (2) the definition of sexual harassment under Illinois and federal law; (3) examples of prohibited conduct that would constitute unlawful sexual harassment; (4) the internal complaint process of the employer available to the employee; (5) the legal remedies and complaint process through the Illinois Department of Human Rights; (6) a prohibition on retaliation for reporting… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by Tammy Binford
The bill has failed in the past but was introduced in the Senate on April 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by skelly
But recently, class action lawyers have begun to target insurance companies with claims that carriers have misclassified these sales agents as ICs instead of employees. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:25 pm
 That directive provides the criteria by which OSHA will conduct the 2008 Site-Specific Targeting (“SST-08”) plan. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 1:35 pm by Nassiri Law
U.S. and California law provide very specific discrimination protections for employees who have historically been the greatest targets. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:35 am by Steven M. Swirsky
  (As we recently reported, the number of states permitting noncompete will soon drop to 46, as the Governor of Minnesota just signed a bill rendering void and unenforceable noncompetes signed on or after July 1, 2023.) [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:57 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Order 2021-1658 of 15 December 2021 extends the system of devolution of rights in respect of software (Article L. 113-9-1 of the Intellectual Property Code) and employee inventions (L. 611-7-1 of the Intellectual Property Code) to natural persons who do not have an employment contract or the status of public employee and who carry out missions within and with the resources of a public or private legal person carrying out research. [read post]