Search for: "Tate v. U. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
“[S]tate courts are the ultimate expositors of state law. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Conditions of confinement claim against federal prison officials presented new Bivens context and was properly dismissed Tate v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
It is clear that "[t]he only 'conduct' which the [s]tate sought to punish is the fact of communication. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Light v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
Mail-order retailers, for instance, have to comply with the often byzantine tax rules of many states, even though "[s]tate taxes differ, not only in the rate imposed but also in the categories of goods that are taxed and, sometimes, the relevant date of purchase. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
California viewed Cohen's display of "Fuck the Draft" on his jacket as "speech";[140] City of Ladue v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Papua New Guinea’s commerce minister is suing Australian Financial Review for defamation over a series of articles about a multinational oil company’s dealings in the small Pacific nation. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Litig., 2019 NY Slip Op. 33515(U) at *1 [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Rucho v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
It’s an interesting case in its own right as an application of U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
Courtesy of Tate. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
After the jump are the panels sponsored by the Law and History CRN a next week's annual meeting in Mexico City. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
Courtesy of Tate. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
, 162 U. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The decision in Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U) [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The parties expressly agreed that the employees in the 250 positions, which were listed in an attached appendix, were "not assigned to any duties that would bring them within the definition of managerial and/or confidential under [Civil Service Law] §201.7(a)" and that the individuals in those positions "share[d] a general community of interest with other [s]tate employees in the P S and T [u]nit. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
[N]umber one, that’s a felony, but that statute makes you unqualified — disqualifies you from holding any further office in the United States and she’s running for a further office under the [U]nited [S]tates. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Tate, 821 F.2d 1328 (U.S. [read post]
