Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education of City School District"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of Buffalo Teachers Fedn., Inc. v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Lynch, 803 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) (wrote opinion) Decision of Board of Immigration Appeals inIn re Briones did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
”Taylor v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 03454 Decided on May 3, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Faced wit alternating periods of hostility and tolerance, the Jewish community of Montreal carved out an educational modus vivendi based on complex and continuing negotiations with the Protestant and Catjholic school boards, the provincial government, and individual municipalities. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Board of Education of the Unadilla Valley Central School District, 97 AD3d 1078, the Appellate Division held that a disciplinary settlement agreement that provided that the appointing authority waived its right to bring certain charges against an individual barred it from subsequently bring charges based on the same event[s] or omission[s] while in Shuler v State of New York, 48 AD3d 384, the court sustained a provision… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Dist., 2014 NY Slip Op 07610, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Appellate Division held that Steven Bregman and the other plaintiffs [Bregman] in this action had waived their right to seniority credit through their teacher association's collective bargaining agreement with the Board of Education for the East Ramapo Central School District. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” In this instance the school board elected to determine which one of the two teachers to retain in service by considering their names in alphabetical order. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Jefferson County School District R-1 v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:43 am
”* The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 28, 2012] and Wiener v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The union claimed that the School District had agreed to be bound by the "rule of one" under a contract negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:00 am
As to the City’s claim that approval by the City Council was required to bind the parties, the Appellate Division said that the Court of Appeals in Board of Education for City School District of City of Buffalo v Buffalo Teachers Federation, 89 NY2d 370, made it clear that “the Taylor Law does not by its terms 'vary or extend the instances in which legislative approval is necessary and does not… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Citing Matter of Bernstein [Norwich City School Dist. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Board of Education, New York City School District, 298 A.D.2d 60 In United Federation of Teachers [UFT] v Board of Education, an action taken to confirm an arbitration award, the critical issue concerned the degree of discretion enjoyed by an employer in determining the "most qualified applicant to fill a vacancy. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:01 am
It said that Syracuse claim relied a decision by the Appellate Division, Third Department, Deposit Central School District v PERB, 214 AD2d 288, holding that the notice of claim requirement in Education Law Section 3813 is a condition precedent to PERB's exercise of jurisdiction over an improper practice charge. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
In contrast, in Cohoes City School District v Cohoes Teachers Association, 40 NY2d 774, the Court of Appeals ruled that contractual provisions between an employee association and an appointing authority may set out procedural safeguards concerning the tenure decision that are subject to grievance arbitration procedures without offending public policy. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
The layoff provisions set out in the Civil Service Law apply to those individuals in the classified service while the layoff provisions set out in the Education Law control in layoffs involving BOCES and school district employees in the unclassified service.Layoff rights are a function of an individual’s appointment status and the jurisdictional classification of the position in which the individual is serving. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
This was the issue considered by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in the Buffalo City School District case. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm
Superior Court, 7 Cal.3d 861 (1972) and Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
The issue before the court concerned the processing of disputes arising under the procedure -- specifically arbitrating the employer’s order directing an individual on Section 207-c leave to report for a light or full duty assignment.There was no question that such a dispute could be arbitrated said the Court of Appeals, pointing to its recent ruling in Board of Education of Watertown City School District (93 NY2d 132).In Watertown School… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Is a school board authorized to conduct performance evaluations of school district administrators? [read post]
