Search for: "Taylor v. Fine" Results 81 - 100 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Druide Informatique i2017 QCCS 4092 https://t.co/Nz2Jn0AaEG -> When chamomile did not have a calming effect on the Court https://t.co/cvvRCSXhVm -> Ukraine Faces Call for US Trade Sanctions over Online Piracy https://t.co/LPKqJmyEpu -> Taylor Swift faces copyright lawsuit for 'Shake It Off' https://t.co/3EBbNgUAcW -> Building a Health App? [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Ct. 2020 (2008), affects the forfeiture determination in this case; and 3) the case is remanded for lower court to consider whether the imposition of the forfeiture violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment in light of recent pertinent case law. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:46 am
Para la fundación La Caixa, de España, erradicar la pobreza mundial costaría tan sólo la décima parte de la suma destinada por el gobierno de Estados Unidos a salvar los bancos que causaron la crisis*.Como nos lo recordara Charles Taylor (Ãâ [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
” In Taylor, the Court recognized that some statutes had alternative crimes within the same statute. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
These fines could be up to $53 million. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2022, judgement was handed down in Taylor v Victorian Institute of Teaching (Human Rights) [2022] VCAT 1367. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Ronald Thwaites QC and Harvey Starte, instructed by Taylor Hampton, appeared for the Claimant and Desmond Browne QC and Alex Marzec, instructed by RPC, for the Defendant. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd continued on 30 and 31 October 2017 before Moulder J. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Michael Oykhman
Lottery offences, notably those listed in s. 206, 207, 207.1 and 209, are all hybrid offences with a maximum punishment of two years in jail, if prosecuted by indictment, and a minimum punishment of 6 months in jail and/or a $5000 fine if prosecuted summarily. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
As Stuart Taylor remarked on the NewsHour: "You fire the U.S. attorney because you want him to do more death penalty cases, that's fine. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
Taylor v Buchanan – does it violate the First Amendment to force Michigan lawyers to pay money to join their Bar Association? [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  Therefore, it was not obvious to test pregabalin – it might be obvious to test gabapentin, but even here the judge considered that the skilled team would have little expectation of success.InsufficiencyAccording to the caselaw relating to sufficiency developed in MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 1699 (Pat) at [458]-[484] and summarised in Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 3311 (Pat) at… [read post]