Search for: "Taylor v. Rice" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
That circuit is bustin out entrapment cases like Taylor Swift and Katy Perry bust out insults of each other. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
(77) Malcom Floyd: If V-Jax ends up on a 10 game hold out or being traded to Seattle, Floyd becomes Rivers # 1 WR. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
On 28 November 2022, Collins Rice J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Garnett & Others [2022] EWHC 3017 (KB). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia The decision in the defamation case brought by former political staffer, Bruce Lehrmann,  against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson was due to be handed down this week, however the ruling has been delayed due to fresh evidence being given by former Channel Seven producer Taylor Auerbach. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Also on 17 July 2023, Collins Rice J granted judgment in default to the claimant and McGee v Lewis [2023] EWHC 1813 (KB). [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 20 January Collins Rice J handed down judgment in Riley v Sivier [2021] EWHC 79 (QB), striking out Mr Sivier’s defence of truth, honest opinion and publication on a matter of public interest in relation to the comments, but it was struck out. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]