Search for: "Taylor v. STATE DEPT. OF MENTAL HEALTH"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Further, as the court held in Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, 121 AD3d 559, a department policy does not trump the probationary period established by law or by a rule or regulations having the force and effect of law. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
Further, a department policy does not trump the probationary period established by law or by a rule or regulations having the force and effect of law [Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 2014 NY Slip Op 07261, Appellate Division, First Department].In addition, a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] may set out procedures to be followed by an appointing… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
Taylor (father) were the biological parents of a son (born in 2002). [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
Box 243172 Anchorage, AK 99524 Phone: (907) 345-7731 Mental Health Alaska's Young Family Network Web: http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Villa/6745 State Mental Health Agency Division of Mental Health/DD Department of Health and Social Services P.O. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Taylor to apply the automatic reversal rule in Holloway v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 13, 2009 Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
" The material presented includes the following [The General Index of Topics and samples from the text are set out below for your review]: General Index of Topics Table of Cases IntroductionAn outline of issues and concerns relevant toSituations involving Sections 207-a and 207-c of theGeneral Municipal LawGeneral Outline Of Cases And Related MaterialsConcerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a,Section 207-c and related lawsThe Full Text of Selected Opinions Selected provisions of law:… [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Dec. 31, 2008)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Burma native's national origin/failure-to-reclassify claim5th Circuit Taylor v. [read post]
