Search for: "Taylor v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:07 am
Pre-determination hearings not required unless a deprivation of a property or liberty interest is threatenedTaylor v NYS Dept. of Correctional Services, 248 A.D.2d 799A psychologist advised a correctional facility’s superintendent that State Corrections Officer Mark Taylor “was dangerous and may lose impulse control at any time. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Augustine School v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 4:00 am
” * Juul v Board of Educ. of Hempstead School Dist. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:38 am
Negotiated disciplinary proceduresFortune v Div. of State Police, App. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:55 am
In April 1999, the then Superintendent of School, Dr. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent indicates that he consented to the assignment, including the direct instruction, although he states that he “had some misgivings” about it.In September 2016, the superintendent received a complaint from a parent concerning petitioner’s refusal to allow students to bring backpacks to the classroom. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" No, according to the Court of Appeal's rulings in Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625 and in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
In this case the Court of Appeals noted that the Taylor Law agreement negotiated by the parties allowed a teacher to be suspended without pay “pending an investigation and recommendation by the superintendent of schools. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The first test was whether subject of the arbitration claim was prohibited under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law Section 200 et seq.) [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Taylor, 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
[b]ecause an important person in the Superintendent’s Office has conspired with [Santiago] to take money that is designated for the instruction of our children and funnel it into [Santiago’s] bank account. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
First Fusco contended that only a school superintendent was authorized to undertake a performance evaluation of school administrators and teachers. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm
The facts, from Pacheco v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
”Taylor v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 03454 Decided on May 3, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
