Search for: "Taylor v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 3:23 am
As the Taylor decision indicates [Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929], in such a situation the individual will be reinstated with back salary.The Taylor court determined that under the terms of Taylor's disciplinary probation, he could be terminated without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, Taylor's job performance was "adversely affected" by his "intoxication on the job. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:45 pm
See, also, Taylor v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Nealon of Lackawanna County in the case of Moses Taylor Foundation v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
Compare Taylor v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
Taylor, 178 N.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:27 am
The classic example: Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
A recent decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals, Taylor v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
This point is illustrated in ruling by the Appellate Division in Taylor v Cass, 505 NY2d 929. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Employee serving a disciplinary probationary period terminated after violation of the terms of a disciplinary settlementMatter of Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 6:57 pm
This was not the first time the Court confronted this issue, for 10 years earlier in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:40 am
"The court's view disciplinary settlements in much the same fashion -- holding the employer to observe the specific terms agreed upon by the parties.The classic example: Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929.Here a disciplinary settlement provided that Taylor would be subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by Taylor's consumption of alcohol. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:54 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor's dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
It seems that under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was “adversely affected” by his “intoxication on the job” during the next six months. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The Court stated that as described in Conolly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
Superior Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 147; Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:13 pm
” The Superior Court, set aside the commission’s findings, enjoined development of the property without prior approval of the court. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am
In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
Nick Taylor (NFP) - "Nick Taylor ("Taylor") filed a complaint in Marion Superior Court against Theatre on the Square ("the Theatre"). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
"NYPPL comment: The classic case addressing this type of distinction is Taylor v Cass, 505 N.Y.S.2d 929.Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after the court found that he was improperly dismissed while serving a disciplinary probation.Under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his… [read post]
