Search for: "Tea v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm by Mark Movsesian
That's pretty weak tea, especially for an anti-discrimination statute. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:29 am by essex county criminal lawyer
Another issue was raised in State v Juan Pablo Santos, that is whether a deported individual could provide testimony remotely for his PCR evidentiary hearing. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:10 am
" He was the lead lawyer representing Texas before the Supreme Court in Medellin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
In that previous post, I noted that Cole v Whitfield untangled the complex thickets of jurisprudence that had grown up around Australia’s equivalent to Part XIII of the Indian Constitution – and, in doing so, reversed some of the Australian constitutional notions (such as those arising from New South Wales v Commonwealth (1948), “the Bank Nationalisation case”) that had been cited and applied by the Indian Supreme Court in Atiabari Tea Co v… [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
In that previous post, I noted that Cole v Whitfield untangled the complex thickets of jurisprudence that had grown up around Australia’s equivalent to Part XIII of the Indian Constitution – and, in doing so, reversed some of the Australian constitutional notions (such as those arising from New South Wales v Commonwealth (1948), “the Bank Nationalisation case”) that had been cited and applied by the Indian Supreme Court in Atiabari Tea Co v… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Heather Gerken
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Jason Mazzone
In an article called "The Millions Left Out of Health Reform by John Roberts," Matthew Yglesias reports that the fact that working poor in certain states will not benefit from the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion is "due to the actions of Chief Justice John Roberts" who, in NFIB v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
These articles concern Judge Vaugn Walker's denial of a summary judgment motion in Perry v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
  I could be down for that.But filing a lawsuit that in 2018 that says that California should ditch its winner-take-all rules isn't my particular cup of tea. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Bristol was presented with eight cups of tea, four of which were prepared with milk added to tea, and four prepared with tea added to milk. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
Fisher, The Design of Experiments at chapter 2 (1935); see also Stephen Senn, “Tea for three: Of infusions and inferences and milk in first,” Significance 30 (Dec. 2012); David Salsburg, The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century  (2002). [2] See, e.g., Dendy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the most closely-watched patent case of the term, United States / Smith & Nephew v. [read post]