Search for: "Teague v. Johnson"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Teague, 286 N.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
Johnson, COA22-363, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Gorsuch explains: Under Teague v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), así como también la determinación en Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
§ 924(c), applying the reasoning of two prior High Court cases on this topic, Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:37 pm
See Teague v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Teague, 2018 U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm
In 2015, in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:05 am
In 2015, in Johnson v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:27 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:53 am
United States, holding that Johnson applies retroactively to cases on collateral review:Under this [Teague] framework, the rule announced in Johnson is substantive. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
United States, No. 15-6418:Last Term, this Court decided Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
” Under Welch, the functional effect of Johnson on Career Offender status makes it a substantive decision that has retroactive effect under Teague in cases on collateral review.For pending cases that depend on whether Johnson applies retroactively to sentences imposed based on Career Offender designation, we need to provide courts with Welch as supplemental and controlling authority in favor of retroactivity. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Last June, Justice Scalia wrote the opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
