Search for: "Tepper v. Tepper" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2007, 7:37 am
The Plain Dealer reports that on Monday, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Tepper v. [read post]
If you have established a trust, such as a revocable living trust, you may have encountered the same issue as the California Court of Appeals in Presta v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 9:19 pm
Orders Hearing on Claim Bank Defrauded Drug Chain Founder, MetNews.com, November 26, 2008 Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court's judgment for the employer and REMAND this case for further proceedings. 07a0420p.06 Tepper v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:34 am
Furthermore, an attorney may be liable for his ignorance of the rules of practice, his failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, his neglect to prosecute an action, or his failure to conduct adequate legal research (see McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592 [1999]). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:59 am by Amir Efrati
Bank v Ernest Harpster, was dismissed last month by Judge Lynn Tepper of Pasco County after she found that an “assignment of mortgage” filed in the case, which was meant to show how U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legalresearch (see, Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006; McCoy v Tepper, 26 1 AD2d 592; Gardner v Jacon,148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645,646). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, the defendant's reliance upon the advice of the borrower's attorney reflects a failure to exercise ordinary reasonable skill (see Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578; McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592, 593; Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511, 514). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, the defendant's reliance upon the advice of the borrower's attorney reflects a failure to exercise ordinary reasonable skill (see Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578; McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592, 593; Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511, 514). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legal research (see McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592; [*2]Gardner v Jacon, 148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645, 646). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, Liotti's inexcusable failure to file timely opposition papers to the RICO defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint and to file a timely notice of appeal from the District Court's order granting such motion, clearly falls below the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d at 1007; McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592, 593). [read post]