Search for: "Texas v. United States Department of Labor" Results 81 - 100 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Coane & Associates
The Justice Department argued that LPRs with certain criminal convictions may be barred from re-entering the United States any time they leave the country—even if the law in effect at the time of their guilty pleas did not make them eligible for deportation or ineligible for reentry to the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Keith Reinfeld
  In 2006, United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued an opinion letter stating that “any employer policy that requires deductions from the salaries of its exempt employees to pay for the costs of lost or damaged tools or equipment” constitutes an “improper deduction,” thereby invalidating the exempt status of any affected employee. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am by Shearil Matthews
Dallas County,[1] the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, handed down a significant Title VII ruling that has far-reaching implications for future employment discrimination cases in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm by Sherica Celine
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Case No. 6:22-cv-450-JDK (E.D. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:55 am by Kate Tornone
United States Department of Labor, No. 4:16-cv-00731 (E.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the late 1800s, magazines published by labor unions were common. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]