Search for: "The Active v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 18,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 7:49 am
Abdirahman v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Abdirahman v Leicester City Council and another: Ullusow v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions “When considering applications made by EU and EEA nationals living in the United Kingdom for social security benefits who were neither economically active nor self-sufficient, lawful presence in the United Kingdom was not to be equated with a "right to… [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 9:31 am
This post is intended as a snapshot of the CRISPR-Cas9 legal landscape in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
The United States Supreme Court held in California v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
Application of the federal Hatch Act barring partisan political activities by certain State and municipal employees Juan Molina-Crespo v United States Merit Systems Protection Board, 547 F.3d 651 Juan Molina-Crespo served as the Executive Director of the Lorain County Children and Families First Council (“LCCFFC”), an Ohio government agency that is financed in part by the federal government. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Application of the federal Hatch Act barring partisan political activities by certain State and municipal employeesJuan Molina-Crespo v United States Merit Systems Protection Board, USCA 6th Circuit, Docket No. 07-3745Juan Molina-Crespo served as the Executive Director of the Lorain County Children and Families First Council ("LCCFFC"), an Ohio government agency that is financed in part by the federal government. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:10 pm
Fifth Circuit affirmed a finding by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana that an ocean-going ship violated the “active control duty” articulated by the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:10 pm
Fifth Circuit affirmed a finding by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana that an ocean-going ship violated the “active control duty” articulated by the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently limited the ability for defendant's to successfully challenge a suggestive or unreliable identification in Perry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
Supreme Court of the United States The U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
[v] https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/gulf-mexico-gom-intergovernmental-renewable-energy-task-force. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:32 am
Friend, the United States Supreme Court addressed the confusion among state courts regarding the appropriate standard to establish a corporate or company defendant's place of business in a diversity case. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
” The battlespace in Syria was messy before the United States intervened. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:25 am
According to a recent filing with the California federal district court in the United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:32 am
In Daimler AG v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
