Search for: "The Confederate Note Case"
Results 1 - 20
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Note that it applies to private as well as public universities in California. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
It was largely taken from the much-maligned Articles of Confederation. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The case of Greene v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits, which was the petitioner in the 1995 Supreme Court case. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Paying competitors not to compete is illegal, but the important thing to note here is that it is illegal even if it is just one competitor paying off another. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
Against this background, it should be noted that rejection of the CSDDD could even lead to further legal fragmentation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
And it is an especially telling sign here, because as noted, States did disqualify persons from holding state offices following ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:09 am
And in particular, they noted, Section 3 was designed to “help ensure an enduring Union by preventing former Confederates from returning to power in the aftermath of the Civil War. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
During the Vietnam War, the Supreme Court noted “a traditional and strong resistance of Americans to any military intrusion into civilian affairs. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
The “Griffin’s Case” argument that Section 3 can only be enforced pursuant to a congressionally enacted statute (or, presumably, in a manner the Constitution itself authorizes, e.g., impeachment, or a House of Congress prohibiting an insurrectionist from sitting). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Its longest chapter will likely be the story of what the Court did in 2024, with the Trump cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Is Justice Jackson going to side with President Trump in the Colorado case? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
That statement was only published years later by a former Confederate general. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Due to my obstructed view, I had to try my best to tell which justice was speaking at any given moment and made notes to compare to the audio recording later on. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Either argument would decisively win the case for Trump. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
Not someone packing a musket to the wigmaker just in case. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that would decide whether the 14th Amendment disqualifies former President Trump from running for president again. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
After the Civil War, thousands of ex-Confederates were disqualified from office without prior criminal convictions. [read post]
