Search for: "The N.A.A.C.P."
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 10:22 am
Jealous, president of the N.A.A.C.P. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
Watson, president of the Columbus branch of the N.A.A.C.P., said in an interview on Friday. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 4:35 am
” N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:00 am
[N.A.A.C.P. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 7:04 pm
According to a report released Friday by the Marijuana Arrest Research Project for the Drug Policy Alliance and the N.A.A.C.P. and led by Prof. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:48 am
Jackson and his wife, the actress LaTanya Richardson Jackson; and Derrick Johnson, the president of the N.A.A.C.P. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The Arkansas Times relied on N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
In New Jersey, where the courts are particularly plaintiff friendly but not beyond the persuasive force of evidence, lawsuit industry claims that talc causes ovarian cancer have not fared well. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:08 am
The N.A.A.C.P. called it a “crime against the American people. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:55 am
Amnesty International, which mobilized much of the opposition to the Davis execution, pledged to redouble its efforts against the death penalty in the United States, and the executive committee of the N.A.A.C.P. voted this week to raise the death penalty to the forefront of its list of priorities in future advocacy. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
Similarly, there is no support for the conclusory contention of the Legal Aid Society and the N.A.A.C.P. petitioners that noncivilian witnesses, namely, police officers and emergency medical technicians, have no expectation of privacy in their grand jury testimony, or that they are not entitled to the same legal protections as civilian witnesses. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
The statute would also criminalize the Claiborne County boycott and related "peaceful political activity" that the Supreme Court held were entitled to constitutional protection in N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 6:16 am
Huntington Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533, 542–48 (2001) (law regulating attorneys violated the First Amendment because it limited “constitutionally protected expression” and “alter[ed] the traditional role of the attorneys”); N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
