Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Calhoun" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
As a starting point the potential lawsuit by the Des Moines Water Works against drainage districts in Sac, Calhoun and Buena Vista Counties raises important legal issues concerning the interpretation and application of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and of the authority and legal status of Iowa’s drainage districts. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:32 am
Last Act: 02/23/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCES6902 VALESKY -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/23/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONLast Action Date: 02/24/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Where the later starts from the premise that all sovereign power is vested in a government whose authority is ordered and constrained by a constitutional document, Chinese constitutional theory starts from the premise of the delegation of sovereign authority from the people to its leading forces constituted as a vanguard party. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Joseph, and Van Buren, counties, and includes most of southern and eastern Allegan and a portion of western Calhoun counties. [read post]
” “It makes sense to limit litigation between public entities because the people of Iowa foot the bill for both sides. [read post]
” “It makes sense to limit litigation between public entities because the people of Iowa foot the bill for both sides. [read post]