Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
That is why, even in a more traditional encampment context (e.g., camping in parks where overnight camping is permitted), regulators often impose limits on how close people can camp to sensitive environmental areas (such as waterways) and limits on how many people can occupy a camp, and for how long.Again, that interest, while not often discussed, would be seen to be of obvious importance near medical facilities, where clean [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
There are lots of people who would be guilty of murder if it's enough that they don't care that someone's "hurt" who definitely wouldn't be guilty of murder if the required showing is that they have to not care that someone may be killed by their actions sufficient to demonstrate a "conscious disregard for human life. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Court House, Richmond Va., during the Davis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Davis, involving a confession erroneously admitted at a murder trial (over Jackson’s dissent). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”)As I have written before, really smart people (including high-level campus leaders) don’t always seem to understand or embrace this crucial distinction between speaking (as is one’s right) and drowning out others who have reserved a place for their own speech. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in contemporary… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
On Monday 1 April 2024, the Scottish Hate Crime and Public Order Act came into effect, extending protections to minorities, including transgender people, who are currently not covered by the law against those ‘stirring up hatred’. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:00 pm
Davis and People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
This resolution denied medical care, social services and education to people suspected of having entered California irregularly. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Case in point is the Second Circuit’s 2001 opinion in On Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
The Case In Sedlik v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
