Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Dudley"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The Inter-American Court of Human RightsIndigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
In both interviews, Dr O’Doherty was asked about the platforming of ‘people connected with paramilitaries on air’ and across local media. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” People v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Regulatory Analysis October 12, 2023 | Joseph Cordes, Susan Dudley and Clark Nardinelli, George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center; Donald S. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Instances might be cited, in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes …. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
Dudley appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
In 1944, the NAACP triumphed in Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2022) EWHC 2328 (QB) A quick note on this possession claim, which involves a challenge to Section 87 Housing Act 1985 as incompatible with Article 8 and 14 ECHR. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
(In two later applications, RM v UK (no. 29080/22) and HN v UK (no. 29084/22)), the Court also decided to apply an interim measure under Rule 39 staying their removal.) [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
KF228.K59 G65 2006 Gold, Susan Dudley. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am
KF228.K59 G65 2006 Gold, Susan Dudley. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Google is being sued for allegedly using NHS health data belonging to 1.6 million people without their consent. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
IPSO 09326-21 Kennedy v Real People, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were two defamation (libel and slander) claims filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
The original may be accessed HERE; another HERE (which includes the original Chinese).It follows below:Credits: This translation was produced by Rogier Creemers and Graham Webster on the basis of DigiChina's earlier translation of the of the second review draft of the law, which in turn was based on our translation of the first draft, produced by Rogier Creemers, Mingli Shi, Lauren Dudley, and Graham Webster. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
