Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ford" Results 181 - 200 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm by Stephen Griffin
  Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
William Ford detailed the Jan. 15 House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing about U.S. efforts to rebuild Afghanistan, featuring John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction (SIGAR). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
With the House of Representatives set to pass the articles of impeachment to the Senate later today, Jan. 15, senators are still debating whether or not the president’s trial should involve hearing from witnesses. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm by Michael Froomkin
Judge Grady was not political; he was appointed in the Ford administration and his politics, at least as visible to his clerks, consisted mostly of a conviction that most people were capable of being good, everyone had a duty to be, and those who weren’t deserved (measured) sanctions. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Ford, the assistant secretary for international security and nonproliferation. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am by Bob Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
” But legal scholars have concluded that impeachment is considerably more law-governed, and constrained, than Ford suggested. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]