Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Knight" Results 41 - 60 of 647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Knight First Amendment Institute (until the issue in that case became moot when President Trump was voted out of office): whether it violates the First Amendment for a government official to block people on a personal social media account that they use to communicate with the public about their official duties. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:44 pm by Josh Richman
The county's ban on physical mail severs the connection that people in jail rely on to stay in touch with their families, communities, and religious leaders,” said Stephanie Krent, a staff attorney with the Knight First Amendment Institute. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Eric Goldman
Trump Violates the Constitution By Blocking @RealDonaldTrump Followers–Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Staff Attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute, Ramya Krishnan analyses the laws’ transparency mandate in an article for Slate. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
Some other countries convict people even if the defendant isn't present, on the theory that it doesn't really matter -- e.g., the defendant can't show specific prejudice. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 The Knight First Amendment Institute posted a blog discussing the amicus brief it filed in Twitter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
” (the answer, for most people, is likely to be “not very well”). [read post]