Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Urbana" Results 1 - 20 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
While that statute remains in effect, it is contradictory to the US Supreme Court ruling in Texas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Jason Greis
PCMC further argued that the six-factor “charitable purpose” test first established by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1968 in Methodist Old People’s Home v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Many leading civil procedure cases do involve discrimination, such as the hugely important Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:00 am by Unknown
Blog posts & press:"An archaeological look at modern refugees," Knowable Magazine, 13 July 2022 [text]- Focuses on the US-Mexico border.Haiti: Wave of Violence Deepens Crisis (Human Rights Watch, July 2022) [text]More assistance urgently needed for people arriving in Mexico’s northern border cities (MSF, July 2022) [text]Reports: Análisis de vacíos de información de protección: Subregión cono sur (Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay y… [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
Wright's challenge is limited to the search of the desktop computer, which was conducted without a warrant but with Hamilton's consent.The Fourth Amendment guarantees the `right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
A recent decision by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to revoke the offer to Steven G. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]